|
August
26, 2008
Tana
Gunville Case Chronology
By
Jack D. McNamara
The
following chronology is compiled from public records
in the courts and press accounts of the Alpine Avalanche and the Big
Bend
Sentinel. This is an unusual case in the sense that we have seen few
examples
of situations involving allegations of fraud using current electronic
devices
such as debit cards.
Tana
Gunville has plead not guilty and she is currently
released on a personal recognizance bond of $20,000. All the related
documents
of the indictment are in the federal district court system, but there
was a
presentation before the Brewster County grand jury in late 2007 which
resulted
in a “no bill.” In other words, there is no 394th District
Court file.
Gunville
and her husband also litigated a lengthy
bankruptcy between 2004 and 2007 in federal court.
Several
motions are pending before the court as we write
on August 26. Gunville’s attorney Mike Barclay told us “no comment”
yesterday
05/08/08 Indictment of Tana
Gunville by a
federal grand jury in Pecos.
05/22/08 Alpine
Avalanche by Suber, set Gunville
trial tentative July 15, U.S. District Court — Gunville on bond —
indicted
“over a week ago” charge of “access device fraud” — arrested March 9 —
plead
not guilty — offense on or about October 12, 2007 to January 15, 2008 —
interstate commerce — no billed by a Brewster County grand jury “last
fall” —
06/13/08 Barclay
& Ogg motion for discovery,
emails, tax returns, phone records of five people including Sheriff
Dodson.
06/30/08 US
Magistrate Stuart Platt conducts a
hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.
07/03/08 Judge
Platt quashes defense subpoenas,
denies Defense requests for Dodson materials (telephone records,
emails, etc.)
as “immaterial” to defense.
07/03/08 Alpine
Avalanche by Suber. Trial date
set for July 21-22 — Comments by AUSA Kerry Fleck —
07/09/08 Alpine
Avalanche by Suber, trial set
for August 12 re Ogg motion for continuance —
08/07/08 Big
Bend Sentinel by Halpern — Defense
motion filed 08/04 in district court, “apparent email exchange” between
government witness and Kathleen DeHart, clerk for US Magistrate Goains
in
Alpine — conspiracy to commit perjury — Gunville free on $20,000
personal
recognizance bond, plead not guilty — Barclay that email 07/24 from
Georgie Wilson
to Kathleen DeHart — Barclay that Junell ordered probe and postponed —
Kathleen
DeHart on administrative leave — DA Frank Brown said he was aware of
defense
motion , if email factual points to conspiracy to commit perjury and
obstruct
justice — matter for federal prosecutors but “other aspects of the
email may
fall within" state purview — “duty bound” to investigate — Barclay
motion asks
court that email’s authenticity be verified.
08/14/08 BBS
Halpern, “Email is a fake,
officials say” headine — “appears faked”
officials say — Sheriff Dodson — his
office seized Wilson’s computer, not sent — “hoax” —Fleck says DeHart
wasn’t at
work on day email sent — “fraudulent” — Gunville received a copy of the
email
in the U.S. Mail by “unknown” person says motion — Dodson asked federal
investigators to enter case because innocent people hurt.
_________________________________________________________________________
August
26, 2008
Gossip
Becomes News
By Jack
D. McNamara
Last
Tuesday, August 19, Assistant U.S. Attorney Kerry Ann Fleck filed a
motion to revoke the bond of Alpine resident Tana Gunville in Pecos. In
early May, Gunville was indicted in federal court for allegedly
stealing and using VISA debit cards, according to news reports.
The
prosecutor’s motion cites incidents of harassment and attempted
intimidation against victims, witnesses and their family members.
On
Thursday, August 21, Brewster County Sheriff Ronny Dodson’s attorney
Dick DeGuerin filed a “Motion by Witness Ronny Dodson for a Protective
Order, Relief from Oppressive and Slanderous Defense Tactics, and
Request for Sanctions and Attorney’s fees.”
The
seven page Dodson motion chronicles documents filed by Gunville and her
attorneys Mike Barclay of Alpine and Kim Ogg of Houston between June 13
and August 14. The motion asserts a wide range of rumor mongering in
the community and falsehoods in Gunville’s motions.
These
motions and other events surrounding this case may result in further
hearings. The U.S. District Court clerk in Pecos informed us that the
trial, originally scheduled for July, has now been “reset” to January
13, 2009.
_______________________________________________________________________
October
15, 2008
Gossip
Goes to Court
By Jack D. McNamara
Early
Tuesday morning, the day after Columbus Day, I
plowed through torrential rains east of Alpine toward Midland. Traffic
was
light but I couldn’t go any faster than my windshield wipers so I was
late for
the 10:30 a.m. hearing in Judge Stuart Platt’s courtroom.
The
question before the court was a motion by the
government to revoke the bond of Mrs. Tana Gunville, an Alpine realtor
(who I
don’t know). She was indicted in federal court in May 2008 on a charge
of
violating 18 U.S. Code, section 1029. The provision became effective in
1994
and Google describes as “Credit Card Fraud” and “Produces/Traffics in
Counterfeit Device.” Her trial is scheduled for early January 2009.
When
I arrived Mrs. Shelby Gonzales was being examined by
Assistant U.S. Attorney Kerry Fleck. Mrs. Gonzales is the victim of the
alleged
theft of a credit card and several debit cards. Mrs. Gonzales testified
to
several incidents of alleged harassment and intimidation by Mrs.
Gunville and
her friends in apparent retaliation for Mrs. Gonzales’s allegations of
theft.
Mrs.
Gonzales was cross-examined by Alpine attorney Mike
Barclay and Houston attorney Kim Ogg, both representing Tana Gunville
in the
ongoing criminal prosecution.
Shortly
after 11 a.m. the court moved on from the
government’s motion to two hearings. One was requested by Mrs. Gonzalez
and her
husband Lupe and the other by Brewster County Sheriff Ronny Dodson. The
Gonzalez couple, represented by Alpine attorney Rod Ponton, and Sheriff
Dodson,
represented by Marfa and Houston attorney Dick DeGuerin, sought court
recognition and protection by the court from the alleged intimidation
and
harassment from Gunville and her friends.
These
two hearings are interesting and significant. At
least the small crowd of family, witnesses, court personnel and at
least one
journalist seemed to think so.
The
allegations were taken to a Brewster County grand
jury in 2007 but the case was no-billed. Sheriff Dodson then took the
case to
federal investigators and Gunville was indicted by a federal grand jury
in May
2008.
The
result of all this, occurring as it did during the
party primaries, was that the process has become highly politicized.
Dick
DeGuerin replaced AUSA Kerry Fleck at the bar and
after an opening statement called Alpine attorney Mimi Smith. She
testified
that she had a conversation with Alpine attorney Mike Barclay,
“probably” in
July, when Barclay called her and said Sheriff Dodson had his
“stingers” out
for Tana Gunville and he knew why. According to Smith, Barclay said
Dodson was
having an “affair” with Shelby Gonzalez. Smith said she told Barclay
the story
was “outrageous” and “over the top.” She said Barclay said he was
“zealously
representing a client.”
Smith
testified she asked Barclay to stop the rumor. “We
don’t do this” she said, and said the unfounded rumor was “like high
school
gossip.” She said the sheriff and his wife both worked 20 hours a day,
“Everybody calls the sheriff or his wife every day and any hour day or
night.”
Smith’s
testimony came after she acknowledged that Mike
Barclay had been her mentor and friend for the entire 16 years she has
been in
Alpine and that Barclay had taught her about ethics and “not burning
bridges.”
She said she had no interest in the specific case and no role.
DeGuerin
asked her “there is a rumor?” Smith said yes and
DeGuerin passed the witness. Mike Barclay went to the podium to
cross-examine
Smith and DeGuerin objected, “(Barclay) can’t be a witness and a lawyer
both.”
Judge Platt agreed and called for Kim Ogg to cross-examine Smith.
Ogg
did not contest the conversation occurred. She
suggested that the conversation was simply lawyer-to-lawyer talk. When
Ogg said
that Barclay had “solid evidence,” however, Judge Platt told Ogg her
comments
were not necessary.
DeGuerin
later objected to Ogg’s line of argument and
pointed to the allegation in papers filed by Barclay and Ogg in June of
this
year. The rumor was transmitted orally and in writing.
Ogg
protested that she did not assert a “romantic”
relationship, only a relationship.
Then
DeGuerin called his client Ronny Dodson to testify.
“Have you ever had a romantic relationship with Shelby Gonzalez?”
Sheriff
Dodson said no. He also said that he contacted
DeGuerin for the purpose of inquiring into the possibility of a libel
or
slander civil lawsuit against the perpetrators of the rumor. DeGuerin
informed
Judge Platt that a lawsuit was still possible and that Sheriff Dodson
had
contacted DeGuerin for that purpose.
Ogg
continued to batter the sheriff with questions
concerning appearance of misuse of his office — “Did you seek
prosecution to
exonerate yourself of rumors?” Ogg ridiculed the charge on which
Gunville was
indicted as a “misdemeanor.”
One
issue quickly disposed of was the complaint by
DeGuerin and Ponton that Ogg and Barclay issued fraudulent subpoenas.
It was
quickly disposed of because both Ogg and Barclay acknowledged their
error.
Judge Platt asked Ogg if she had typed in U.S. District Judge Robert
Junell’s
name on the subpoena? She said yes. Judge Platt asked if she consulted
with
Barclay? She said yes, both (Barclay and Ogg) made the mistake. Barclay
stood
up and apologized. Rod Ponton, representing Lupe and Shelby Gonzales,
called an
attorney from Ben E. Keith, the food service company which employs Lupe
Gonzales.
The lawyer testified to several communications with Kim Ogg concerning
subpoenas for the serial numbers of debit card awards to Lupe Gonzales.
Judge
Platt called the Gunville hearing to a halt about
1:30 p.m. He said he had a full docket of criminal matters for the
afternoon. I
had the impression the judge intended to decide the Gunville issues
quickly.
As
if the fraudulently issued subpoena issue was not
sufficiently compelling or the village rumor circuit sufficiently
tantalizing,
the hearing was foreshadowed by the high tension of the 83rd
District Attorney Democratic primary in March this year. Incumbent
Frank Brown
of Alpine was defeated by Jesse Gonzales of Ft. Stockton by a razor
thin
margin. And only after three ballot boxes were “discovered” in the
Brewster
County voting office vault — three days after the election. Barclay and
Brown
are good friends, part of a Brewster County group of lawyers which
includes
County Judge Val Clark Beard, County Attorney Steve Houston and others.
Mimi
Smith attributed Barclay’s rumor as an effort to
“avenge” Frank Brown’s defeat.
Sheriff
Dodson openly supported Jesse Gonzales. Dodson testified
that District Attorney Brown refuses to prosecute good cases. Now
Sheriff
Dodson takes some of those cases to federal investigators. He said he
takes all
drug cases to the federal investigators. •
|